Not so simple

BBC says,"A controversial new "right to die" card is being offered to the public that allows anyone to refuse treatment in a medical emergency.
It's a morbid question, but one that many of us have pondered at least once.
If I hadn't just escaped that dreadful accident, where would I be now? Would I rather be dead than depend on others to keep me alive?
A new card seeks to address that very question. Available in pubs, banks, libraries, GP surgeries, even some churches, the Advanced Decision to Refuse Treatment (ADRT) card sits snugly in a wallet or purse and instructs a doctor to withhold treatment should the carrier lose the capacity to make decisions, because of an accident or illness.
Dubbed the "right-to-die card", it's being seen by some as a short-cut to euthanasia.
But its backers say it is a practical way of implementing the Mental Capacity Act, which came into force in 2007.
The act allows adults to draw up "advance directives" stating what sort of treatment they don't want should they lose capacity. They build on the principle of "living wills" but, crucially, mean that doctors are legally bound to abide by a patient's wish to refuse life-sustaining treatment.
Taken in haste
Carrying the card alerts anyone who finds it that the patient has made decisions about treatment, and there is a detailed statement to be found with named relatives or friends and, ideally, their GP.

Salford City Council, which is behind the card, says it is merely putting the information out there in public places, for people to make their own choice. It stresses advance decisions are not only about death but can also include preferences about treatment and care patients do want.
But so-called pro-life campaigners say they could be snapped up in haste by people who haven't fully understood the complexity of the issues involved.
Given the ferocity of the debate between the pro-choice and pro-life movements, it is somewhat surprising to hear that Salford's card scheme was dreamed up by just one person.
The woman - who has asked not to be named - is involved with social care services in Salford because she has a son with mental health problems.
"She was thinking of the idea of advance decisions both as a retired woman, and as a carer, and thought this would be useful," says Judd Skelton, a Salford council officer who looks after user and carer issues.
However, pro-life campaigners such as Dr Andrew Fergusson, from the Christian Medical Fellowship, say such important decisions should not be merely committed to paper. Agreeing that patients should have more autonomy than in previous generations, Dr Fergusson nevertheless wants people to appoint a proxy to speak for them if they become incapacitated.
"One of our concerns is that the things people want when they are well are very different to those they want when they are unwell. Their values change," he says.
Slow down treatment
The former GP and hospital doctor, whose organisation is also part of the Care Not Killing alliance, says advance directives may be forcing medics to work "with one hand tied behind their backs" - although the legislation does leave room to challenge the patient's statement.
And he is worried that a card saying "stop" to a doctor could lead to a "change of gear" in emergency situations that would affect decision-making.
The Salford cards certainly seem to be stirring passions locally. Reports that they have been snapped up enthusiastically by locals appear to be partly countered by the comments of at least one person contributing to a local newspaper messageboard.
"I'm appalled by these cards," it reads, "and I removed as many as I could from Swinton Library yesterday.""

Cynical me thinks the government might promote these cards to save the NHS money. In the past I had told my wife I fancied a "Do not resuscitate" card but she wants me kept alive. I am in two minds about this. I do not think the card can be a simple one. It needs to say under what circumstances one wishes to be allowed to die. Then the medics may not know the prognosis until they try. Having twice agreed with the medics that they should not prolong life when father and father in law were dying, perhaps I should trust the next generation to make the decision. Or could one have a card saying that I might want to die but as usual I will defer to She Who Must be Obeyed.